THE DA VINCI CODE
79 ratings since posting on Wednesday, August 18, 2004
|
Overall Rating   based on 79 ratings |
||
|
|
|||
|
First of all I did not read the book. The movie lost my interest in about 20 minutes. I can't think of any compelling reason to read it. -  Bobzilla
,
posted 04/29/07
|
|
I like the story but I find it is more of an interesting way to get into the whole Grail mysteries than a groundbreaking masterpiece in itself. It would be a shame to not read "The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail" and "The Dead Sea Scroll Deception" by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh since they offer much of the background info for this story. It is nice to see this topic in the mainstream since I first read about it over twenty years ago! Let's keep talking about it! - Paloma , posted 04/29/07 |
|
Enjoyed the story but didn't quite enjoy the ending. I'm glad I read the book however before I saw the movie because it was that fast that I don't think I would have understood all those car chases. - Angela Dannette , posted 04/29/07 |
|
I loved the book. The false finishes were great. The book was a roller-coaster ride from beginning to end. Too bad it didn't make for that great a movie. - Todd , posted 02/10/07 |
|
must admit dan brown has a "way with words" to get the world's attention! ummm let me think ...that takes talent! loved the book...the movie was, well, not as engaging for me. - mazee , posted 06/24/06 |
|
Dan Brown is a moron. He's not very good at writing and while he had a GREAT concept, he had horrible, poorly constructed charecters. The "suspense" was created by the usage of an elipsis on every page and moronic puzzles that are very, very unclever. Backwards writing. wow. I'm stunned. - Robert , posted 06/11/06 |
|
Dan Brown just suckered 40 million hardcover copies of his mediocre book worldwide! A marketing genius! And the movie, c'mon! I mean Tom Hanks, laughable! Is it a cartoon? Then "Opie", Ron Howard, as the director! What is this "Cacoon 7" ? The only reason I would see this movie would be for the painting masterpieces! But then again, they will be cheapened and in being prostitued they will lose their status in the art world. Just for a few "scammers" to make a bucks! So sad! - PaulieWalnuts , posted 05/17/06 |
|
An easy, fun read, and I'm looking forward to seeing the movie. But I'm puzzled as to why it's become such a best seller. Poorly written, poorly plotted and all the ideas in it about Mary Magdalene and the Templars and Jesus have been around for ages. What's the appeal, here? Maybe all this emphasis on family values making people long for Jesus to have had an earthly family, himself? Very puzzling. - Inanna , posted 05/07/06 |
|
Unputdownable, Compelling, Thought provoking, A Mystery Worm Hole. - Moonglow Gal , posted 04/23/06 |
|
Unsu...
|
I didn't find it terribly deep or unpredictable, but I found it really fun to read. I want to see the flick, too. - Unsubscribed , posted 04/21/06 |
|
It's one thing to write a slap dash crappy mystery with two dimensional characters, a mind numbingly predictable plot, and attrocious dialogue. It's another thing to preface it with a shit load of intellectual dishonesty. I'm dissapointed that so many in this country found it to be a revelation. 'Wait, you mean the Catholic Church is Mysogynistic?! You mean to tell me the Bible was written and edited by mortal men?! You mean to tell me Christianity borrows from previous traditions?!' Shocking. - stuart , posted 04/21/06 |
|
enjoyable story - interesting plot. The perfect read if you have a liberal arts education and want to pat yourself on the back for how cultured you are when you get the references the author makes in the story. I'm a little disturbed that people think this is a deep or thought provoking book. - My Body is a Temp... , posted 04/20/06 |
|
The writing is pure schlock! The plot is ridiculous and the characters poorly drawn. It'll make a great movie. The only positive of this book is that it introduced a few ideas to a mainstream audience. But read Umberto Eco's "Foucault's Pendulum" for the conspiracy, and a host of well-researched books for the historical/religious analysis ( " The Cathedral of the Black Madonna", "The Jesus Mystery", "The God of Ecstasy", "The Complete Gospels", ...). - Christopher
,
posted 02/09/06
|
|
Unsu...
|
One of my favorites, can't wait for the next...... - Unsubscribed , posted 02/02/06 |
|
the meat of the da vinci code is based on two books. first holy blood, holy grail and second, the templar revelation. holy blood, holy grail came first in 1982 and was groundbreaking. the book is even referenced in da vinci code and a character in the book is an amalgam of the authors. the second book expanded on holy blood, holy grail and is a more current addition to the templar grail literature. ok, so then, da vinci code... it's sort of like the celestine prophecy of grail literature. it takes some very insightful material, boils it down to a fifth grade reading level and uses the page turner thriller as a delivery system. to his credit, brown is a much better writer than redfield, the author of the celestine prophecy, so he's able to create a better action story to move his central agenda forward. i personally accept the bulk of the holy blood, holy grail "hypothesis" as a legitimate explanation for why the templars were burned at the stake and why the gnostic gospels are so "heretical." i believe that the catholic church has a strong interest invested in keeping subversive history marginalized and while i don't think that 100% of the story has surfaced yet, i think that the historians who are working with the grail lineage are onto far more than most fundamentalists would like to believe. the book is averaging three and a half stars on tribe. that's about where i'd put my rating. but since i can only vote in full stars, i'll round up and give the book four stars. it deserves the extra half-star just for being one of those subversive media viruses that gets into the mainstream consciousness. - Shady
,
posted 01/19/06
|
|
He writes a fictious story, makes up a bunch of fictious events and states a bunch of lies and tells it as if its truth. Trying to make money by attacking the credibilty of Christianity. - Firth , posted 01/18/06 |
|
Unsu...
|
female godhead, demonizing the Catholic Church, Da Vinci's Last Supper....it goes on and on.. and people think it's true...LOL - Unsubscribed , posted 01/05/06 |
|
To his credit, Dan Brown blends fiction with a drop of fact and plenty of conjecture to create what many are beginning to accept as historical truth... this book is fiction... please remind yourself of that if you buy it... and again while you are reading. - Tim , posted 01/01/06 |
|
Unsu...
|
Seriously all his books have the same story, same characters. This one is nothing special... - Unsubscribed , posted 11/14/05 |
|
This book was very enlightening, especially for a Christian. I'd never heard most of the theories put forth, and it's compelled me to do a little research of my own. - Meghann , posted 11/10/05 |
|
I thought this book was an excellent and informative read. I just found myself kind of wishing the climax happened at the end instead of right in the middle of it, but then again that kind of makes this particular book also unique! - Kiarah , posted 10/28/05 |
|
Unsu...
|
Especially because of its anti-Christian views. It's good to share some light nowadays. - Unsubscribed , posted 10/28/05 |
|
i still can't decide if this should be on the "non-fiction" list, or some mid way category. the fact that the catholic (and other christian) churches got so bent and "condemned" this work speaks for itself. any small hint that there might...just might be a few true facts here really collapses their house of cards...or rather billion dollar empire. - ryan5 , posted 10/07/05 |
|
It took me 2 weeks to read the first half of the book, then once I got to the 2nd half I couldn't put the book down and finished that half in one night. It's a very good mystery book and kept me at the edge during the 2nd half. However, as somone who was raised as a Christian/Catholic since birth.....the details of the story were very disappointing to me. I felt as if everything that I have been taught was all a lie. Anyway, I've been exploring other religions ever since. - Frida , posted 10/05/05 |
|
I am pretty sure I can tell you where the idea came from to do this book. <p>I live outside USA, and so please have a good laugh on me; idea was a post card to Studio One, JL's old address, to someone named Y.O. <P>New pub here called Murphey Brown's. Rudy's gonna buy yezz all a drink. - grandpa , posted 10/05/05 |
|
This was a fun easy book to read. I thought it was very interesting that the majority of the world was Pagan(earth worshipers) and the Christian religion came along and tried to push the goddess off the map. Im glad the sacred femenin is still intact. - joseph , posted 09/27/05 |
|
I listened to the tape on trips to Zion National Park and Flaming Gorge, it kept me awake at least! I definitely enjoyed the book. :-D - Edward , posted 09/25/05 |
|
The book moved at a good pace and was one that I hated to put down. It kept me interested and racing to the end. I wasn't lost at all despite not having read Angels & Demons either. I was surprised at how much I learned while reading it too-all sorts of random tidbits of information. - Bridgette , posted 09/22/05 |
|
all i have to say is. read the da vinci code and you might just question your faith - feel the beat , posted 09/15/05 |
|
The writer put a lot of effort into this book but the plot, so promising at first fell apart and began to go in circles and was just too incredible after they stole the armored truck. Follett and Grisham are both vastly superior thriller authors. The material was fresh and the idea great but the delivery weak - David , posted 08/26/05 |
|
Well, it had a really slow start and I had to deduct points because of the pretentious references to Paris and "Great Art Appreciation". In the middle, it sped up a bit with the historical bits (are these or could they be the actual facts?). But, the story didn't build up enough steam to propel me to the end of the book, so I put it to the side. - Smasharolla , posted 08/23/05 |
|
Wenn schon jemand ein Buch kauf das "Der Da Vinci Code" heisst und vom einem Popular Autor ist, erwartet er Unterhaltung oder Wissens Vermittlung ? Ich habe Unterhaltung erwartet und sie auch bekommen. Tolles Buch, wir haben gleich die ganze Serie von Dan Brown gekauft. OK I try to translate: If someone is buying a book with the title "The Da Vinci Code" from a popular author, is he/she awaiting entertainment of Knowledge Transfer ? I have expected Entertainment and that is what I got. Super to read, excellent story and we have bought the whole series of Dan Brown. - Joerg , posted 08/22/05 |
