|
|
Rubbed me very WRONG: This film had a polarizing effect, and i'm glad to be on the other side.
I could only stomach 20 minutes of it... and i saw it for free on the web... very glad i didn't contribute to its coffers. One glaring faux pax is the filmmaker's assumption that success is mainly determined by material gain... and even if gathered through spiritual or pro-active means (for internal justification, empowerment, whatever...), its still Materialism! I didn't see enough of the movie to learn if it eventually softens up on this me-me-me thing, but based on the first several scenes, hey, it may be fashionably new age and all, but its still greed... its kinda like Pirates of the Caribbean somehow glossing over the dirty deeds of so-called "good" pirates... as if their thefts and murders were less mortal than those of the less-dashing, ugly or evil-possessed pirates...
And oh yes, both movies were smashing successes... (and must be "giving people what they want".... especially those easily enthralled by stories of sudden riches... envisioning themselves inside such a story. The Secret (at least the 20 minutes that i could stomach) seemed centered upon successes gained through a sort of spiritual piracy, and much less concerned with the general "order of things" in the world... seemed a bit too philosophically self-centered... missing the point of how every living person's individual struggle is part of a grand ethical equation where the same rules 'should' apply to every-body (like if there was a true democracy)... and while it would be cool if there was such a thing as alchemy.... and alchemy of opportunity... I think its socially destructive (and culturally irresponsible) to encourage people to put their energies into trying to "attract" miracles like this... as opposed to putting real effort into analyzing and perfecting the INTEGRITY of exactly what it is that they're trying to achieve, the integrity of their plan of action, their actual work, and finally how to spend and distribute their profits with integrity, if and when successful....
So why are individual works like this actually destructive in the larger cumulative scale? Preaching to those wanting something for nothing... like the televangelist hawking salvation... starts treading into dangerous territory once such a thing becomes mass-successful, introducing crowd mentality... at which point the thing becomes its own entity, further corruptible... (a "brand", a corporation... a cult leader or a political candidate).... When i heard it was embraced by Oprah, that's when it really peaked my curiosity, and sounded my skeptic alarm. But whether its self-help guides, all-out religion, or most especially, something so impressionable as entertainment (via illusion, false hopes or non-sustainability): Giving people what they want... (or what they want to hear) is surely not always a good thing. This film obviously has a very polarizing effect, and i'm glad to be on the other side.
-
Greg
,
posted 03/16/07
|